ErixSan
Somehow still top 3 poster after 3 years.
Towns Folk
Okay, because it seems people doesn't understand my status from three day ago, I will do it easy to understand.
I saw the video apology and I saw the message of him shared by @Heart, nor materials reflect all the actions from him.
The story behind the two reviews: (My part of why I don't want him back)
I must apology I don't have a full record of the events. I can't find a few private posts where I also asked for progress.
Why he got banned?
Reading this should be enough: http://forum.3dspedia.com/threads/message-from-bjfauble.6830
Why it's bad not doing a review we got to do?
-------------------------------------------------------------
Now, a easy reply to understand to the replies I got
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not a villain here and I didn't ban him.
I don't care if he's back on the forum, but I don't want him writing for the site again.
It doesn't matter what age you have, you must follow the rules and accept your responsibilities.
He wanted to get banned, do stuff that broke the rules and happened.
The rules are the same for everyone, we can't do exceptions.
I saw the video apology and I saw the message of him shared by @Heart, nor materials reflect all the actions from him.
The story behind the two reviews: (My part of why I don't want him back)
I must apology I don't have a full record of the events. I can't find a few private posts where I also asked for progress.
July 1st:
He asked to review Glory of Generals.
July 2nd:
He got the review code of Glory of Generals.
July 3rd:
He finished the review of Squids Odyssey for 3DS.
July 7th:
I will quote part of the conversation I got from him:
July 7-8th:
He did the review of Anonymous Notes – From the Abyss – Chapter 1 and was published on the site.
July 17th:
He did the review of Yoshi's New Island
July 18th:
He asked for Super Toy Cars review, he would get a code a few days later.
August 10th:
He sent me the review of Call of Duty: Ghosts.
Quote:
10 minutes later:
August 18th:
I asked for his progress, quote:
Later:
August 19th:
We told him he didn't need to worry about Glory of General review (If you noticed, this is 7 weeks after he got the code). Marc bought an $10 eShop card to me in order to buy the game.
August 20th-21st:
Glory of General review was finished the 20th, got published the next day.
August 28th:
I believe BJFauble was banned that day. Marc bought Super Toy Cars in order to review it.
September 14th:
@Heart shared a message from Bjfauble. Quoting:
October 13th:
Bjfauble uploaded a video apology, also shared by @Heart
October 15th:
YouTube chat:
Why I did a line on Glory of Generals part? Meanwhile I can understand he was busy when he needed to write Super Toy Cars review, he said he played around 3 hours on around two months?
End of story
He asked to review Glory of Generals.
July 2nd:
He got the review code of Glory of Generals.
July 3rd:
He finished the review of Squids Odyssey for 3DS.
July 7th:
I will quote part of the conversation I got from him:
Oh, games I'll be reviewing this week most likely -
Anonymous Notes Chapter 1 (Score: 3/10)
Unepic (Score: 8.5/10)
Glory of Generals
Bit. Trip Runner (Score: 8.0/10)
Paper Mario Sticker Star (Score: 8.0/10)
Glory of Generals is horrible btw lmao that's why I keep procrastinating it.
July 7-8th:
He did the review of Anonymous Notes – From the Abyss – Chapter 1 and was published on the site.
July 17th:
He did the review of Yoshi's New Island
July 18th:
He asked for Super Toy Cars review, he would get a code a few days later.
August 10th:
He sent me the review of Call of Duty: Ghosts.
Quote:
This is awkward as f, luckily I have no shame lulz
You asked me to review it so I'm going to. After Gamescom is over, I'm going to play Super Toy Cars and Glory of Generals harder than anything. I promise.
10 minutes later:
Glory of Generals is around 60 hours long.
Oh and, by Gamescom I more or less meant after Tuesday. After Sony's event, I'll start playing them both.
August 18th:
I asked for his progress, quote:
I'm almost done with Super Toy Cars, sorry. Something came up with my family so I had to miss playing games for a few days. I'm going to have to ask for a little longer with Glory of Generals.
Later:
I'm almost done with Super Toy Cars, sorry. Something came up with my family so I had to miss playing games for a few days. I'm going to have to ask for a little longer with Glory of Generals.
August 19th:
We told him he didn't need to worry about Glory of General review (If you noticed, this is 7 weeks after he got the code). Marc bought an $10 eShop card to me in order to buy the game.
August 20th-21st:
Glory of General review was finished the 20th, got published the next day.
August 28th:
I believe BJFauble was banned that day. Marc bought Super Toy Cars in order to review it.
September 14th:
@Heart shared a message from Bjfauble. Quoting:
It was childish and I was acting out because I didn't want to fullfill my duties as a part of the 3DS Pedia blog. When I got banned.
I'm sorry for neglecting my obligation of reviewing that game.
October 13th:
Bjfauble uploaded a video apology, also shared by @Heart
October 15th:
YouTube chat:
Why I did a line on Glory of Generals part? Meanwhile I can understand he was busy when he needed to write Super Toy Cars review, he said he played around 3 hours on around two months?
End of story
Why he got banned?
Reading this should be enough: http://forum.3dspedia.com/threads/message-from-bjfauble.6830
Why it's bad not doing a review we got to do?
When we get a review code of the game, it's actually a type of "contract". They give us the review copy and we write the review about it as a press site (something with embargo included).
If a review isn't done, the site can be declared as a scam, affecting the whole staff and @Marc itself.
In short words, not doing your duties will affect the reputation of the site.
If a review isn't done, the site can be declared as a scam, affecting the whole staff and @Marc itself.
In short words, not doing your duties will affect the reputation of the site.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Now, a easy reply to understand to the replies I got
-------------------------------------------------------------
Heart said:I agree with you Erixsan, he is a disgrace to humanity and lets continue flaunting our personal hate towards him and act like immature primal primitive machines with no sense of forgiveness or mercy.
That doesn't reflect the opinion of the staff, and nobody thinks he is, like @Heart said, "a fat 14 year old American" nor "a disgrace to humanity".
Heart said:But seriously, your exaggerating the mistakes of 14 year old who is deeply apologizing, to ensure he can't be unbanned. No way you feel good about yourself.
I don't decide who is banned or unbanned. I only said I don't want him to write for the main site again (not the forum).
Jack said:You can't call yourself a serious community if you permanently shun a 14 year old from the community because of one mistake.
Like I did mention, it wasn't just one mistake.
Erixsan said:[...]I'm not talking more about the topic.
Again, I will repeat: I don't want him on the site, I don't care if he's again on the forum.
Jack said:>"I don't wanna talk about it"
>Makes a topic about it
If you're going to defend an user, at least do it seriously. I never said I didn't want to talk about the topic before commenting that on my profile. If you want to provoke it only makes your opinion invalid.
Jack said:Oh no a 14 year old was unable to playing a video game to write a review online, how terrible.
I already explained why it's bad.
Also if you accept a job and you don't do it, you will get fired eventually.
Also if you accept a job and you don't do it, you will get fired eventually.
I'm not a villain here and I didn't ban him.
I don't care if he's back on the forum, but I don't want him writing for the site again.
It doesn't matter what age you have, you must follow the rules and accept your responsibilities.
He wanted to get banned, do stuff that broke the rules and happened.
The rules are the same for everyone, we can't do exceptions.