Call Of Duty Vs Battlefield

  • Thread starter jams3223
  • Start date

COD or Battlefield

  • Total voters
    8
jams3223

jams3223

The Task Blanker
Towns Folk
So like all of you crazy gamers who love action game and fire games might take a straight decision of what's you're favorite between those two games so like I've said I will be doing some project to decide what's more good as a shooting game so it is COD or Battlefield so we don't know why don't you vote to see who as been the best and take a time to watch this video:
And tell us what's you're ideal of a game, thanks and have fun.
 
Last edited:
You can't compare Call of Duty and Battlefield, they're really different from each other.

If I had to choose though I'd take Call of Duty in a heartbeat. It's just a more appealing franchise, imo.
 
COD for me. It's a pretty awesome series (considering I'm not really a fan of FPS games). I haven't played Battlefield before, so COD it is. I think it's more widely played amongst gamers alike, as well.
 
Battlefield because of better graphics (imo), more Gore and planes and stuff that you can use in multiplayer.
 
If you guys played Battlefield 2 (Not BF:Bad Company 2) you'll be surprised how the game is still popular today lol BF2 survives through newer games because of mods lol Anyways, CoD was nice (WAS) back in the days. Now, CoD and Battlefied looked similar except the vehicle riding and larger scaled maps in BF and the Faster-paced FPS and abundant 12 year-old boy prostitutes that did everyone's moms in CoD. IMPO both games lost their "real" luster in what they made theirselves unique from any other FPS games. Now they're just trying to wow the audience with cutting-edge graphics and new story lines from the games, albeit the same game as the previous series. lol >.> Still, I would pick Battlefield for the best multiplayer memories lol
 
I like Battlefield over CoD. Battlefield has HUGE maps, with a variety of vehicles to choose from. You also have a lot of places to hide and snipe, and that's what I love doing.
You can also use vehicles like helicopters and that adds a lot more optioins as to what you can do besides shooting the guy in front of you.
In CoD, if you try to hide and snipe, everyone will call you camper, you will hear "Ha nub you sux l2p"
 
I like Battlefield over CoD. Battlefield has HUGE maps, with a variety of vehicles to choose from. You also have a lot of places to hide and snipe, and that's what I love doing.
You can also use vehicles like helicopters and that adds a lot more optioins as to what you can do besides shooting the guy in front of you.
In CoD, if you try to hide and snipe, everyone will call you camper, you will hear "Ha nub you sux l2p"
Click to expand...
I agree with my friend Ali. Battlefield is definitely the more superior FPS out there, even CoD has way more following but I think that BF deserves more attention. It's more realistic in ways that CoD can never be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 532
I'd choose Battlefield for its 64 player matches, but both have become the formula for generic FPS. I would much rather play shooters with at least some unique elements. I would personally recommend Planetside 2. I played over 600 hours in that game and I think it's probably my favorite PC game of all time. It's just massive warfare with thousands of players fighting on four different continents. I'd definitely check it out. Other than that, haven't played many FPSs. I have hear that Counter Strike Global Offensive is pretty good but I haven't bought it yet. Maybe next year we'll get Star Wars Battlefront which might just be the FPS game of the generation (I really hope it will).
 
Id choose call of duty. here's why. I love battlefield's playstyle, but i think the fluidity of call of duty is way higher quality, theres always lag in battlefield, like i shoot you, i know i put like 5 bullets into you before you even raised your gun, but i still lost. Like how tha..... at least on call of duty that happens less, i spend more of my time worrying about campers and less about, how did he kill me when i started shooting first.
 
  • #10
I agree with my friend Ali. Battlefield is definitely the more superior FPS out there, even CoD has way more following but I think that BF deserves more attention. It's more realistic in ways that CoD can never be.
Click to expand...

Call of Duty isn't trying to be realistic in the slightest, though. I will agree that Battlefield was a LOT prettier than every Call of Duty before Advanced Warfare though.

Call of Duty is an arcade style shooter. Battlefield is basically war simulator 2013
 
  • #11
Call of Duty isn't trying to be realistic in the slightest, though. I will agree that Battlefield was a LOT prettier than every Call of Duty before Advanced Warfare though.

Call of Duty is an arcade style shooter. Battlefield is basically war simulator 2013
Click to expand...
You're right, CoD is just an arcade shooter aimed at little kids. Battlefield is a more of a war-themed shooter where you don't just go running about shooting wildly instead you have to strategize and plan your attacks or defense carefully. If you're a fan of Advanced Warfare, I'd suggest playing Titanfall and you will definitely fall in love with it. Just bought it today and already loving it.
 
  • #12
Hahaha I agree battlefield isn't a game that you can play on any crap
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top