MindzEye
Pssst. I was gone for almost a year. XD
Towns Folk
(If it is at your convenience, please explain your motive on voting in one of the two categories.)
It was about this time in 2015, when I came across a post that rose my intrigue.
On Miiverse, in the Pokemon Art Academy community, a popular post during the 2nd week of January opened
up with "Please only draw pokemon on pokemon art academy." (complete with a sad Pikachu.)
As I went on, the user, who I shall name only as Tia for her sake, complained of the non-pokemon art in
the community. (To an extent, alot of it was Fnaf fan drawings at the time, so I at least understood the motive.)
But Tia went so far as to demand that users either "only draw pokemon," or "just post somewhere else."
Even further, Tia claimed that the users "would be banned because of the user-agreement."
This was of course met with dismal support...
Many users (myself included,) argued that the off-topic policies of the user-agreement did not extend to use
of an art-program as an art-program. Others explained that their parents did not allow them to log in to other
art-sites like DA - Yes, the argument was Tia versus the children of MV whose parents' rules of the internet would not allow them access to alternate websites: basically Tia vs %75 of MV.
After which, all fell silent, Tia's command was ignored, and the whole thing was shortly forgotten.
But who among you agrees with those who argued with Tia? Who here agrees with Tia? Is "Poke-Purity"
still a thing? Would it make a difference where the drawing was drawn or posted? I'd like to hear from all of you about this no-longer-relevant issue.
It was about this time in 2015, when I came across a post that rose my intrigue.
On Miiverse, in the Pokemon Art Academy community, a popular post during the 2nd week of January opened
up with "Please only draw pokemon on pokemon art academy." (complete with a sad Pikachu.)
As I went on, the user, who I shall name only as Tia for her sake, complained of the non-pokemon art in
the community. (To an extent, alot of it was Fnaf fan drawings at the time, so I at least understood the motive.)
But Tia went so far as to demand that users either "only draw pokemon," or "just post somewhere else."
Even further, Tia claimed that the users "would be banned because of the user-agreement."
This was of course met with dismal support...
Many users (myself included,) argued that the off-topic policies of the user-agreement did not extend to use
of an art-program as an art-program. Others explained that their parents did not allow them to log in to other
art-sites like DA - Yes, the argument was Tia versus the children of MV whose parents' rules of the internet would not allow them access to alternate websites: basically Tia vs %75 of MV.
After which, all fell silent, Tia's command was ignored, and the whole thing was shortly forgotten.
But who among you agrees with those who argued with Tia? Who here agrees with Tia? Is "Poke-Purity"
still a thing? Would it make a difference where the drawing was drawn or posted? I'd like to hear from all of you about this no-longer-relevant issue.