Killer B
Killer B, yo
Towns Folk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blind loyalty. He chose to fight for Virginia's independence in spite of slavery. If he fought for the union, Virginia would have still achieved freedom at the cost of banning slavery. Honestly, he only delayed the inevitable for his home and the South as a whole.He might've been fighting for the Confederates, but the reason was because he loved his home.
I'm not so sure it was blind loyalty as much as his love for his home state. I think he thought about it a lot and when it came down to it, he loved Virginia above all else and wanted to defend it.Blind loyalty. He chose to fight for Virginia's independence in spite of slavery. If he fought for the union, Virginia would have still achieved freedom at the cost of banning slavery. Honestly, he only delayed the inevitable for his home and the South as a whole.
I'm not merely stating whether he was absolutely bad or good; thus would be a simpleton answer within a thread of this subjective magnitude. I just want to assert that no man is perfect, and General Lee was no exception. Categorizing him with one word wouldn't be enough in his case.
That defines blind loyalty to its deepest core: staying faithful to something or someone in spite of being offensive to the opposing something or someone else. Within this case, he stayed with Virginia, eventually building up the ire towards himself from slaves across the South. A man should be led by his own ideals. It follows the saying, if he jumped off a bridge, would you choose the same fate?I'm not so sure it was blind loyalty as much as his love for his home state. I think he thought about it a lot and when it came down to it, he loved Virginia above all else and wanted to defend it.
Oh, no, he did something offensive, that's never happened before. As far as the bridge thing, it depends on the situation. And had he joined the North, he would've gained the ire of his home. I'll take the ire of slaves over the ire of my home any day.That defines blind loyalty to its deepest core: staying faithful to something or someone in spite of being offensive to the opposing something or someone else. Within this case, he stayed with Virginia, eventually building up the ire towards himself from slaves across the South. A man should be led by his own ideals. It follows the saying, if he jumped off a bridge, would you choose the same fate?
Virginia lost anyways; he technically chose to jump of the bridge. Moreover, I think you forget that slaves were normal humans, not just tools of enterprise. Hate from them rivaled that of his home any day.As far as the bridge thing, it depends on the situation. And had he joined the North, he would've gained the ire of his home. I'll take the ire of slaves over the ire of my home any day.
Exactly why I think he wasn't necessarily just a "good" man. His complex attributes paired with an inconsistent record of deeds deemed both questionable and moral, trivial or not, all place him among the ranks of other historical of a similar caliber such as Andrew Carnegie. I won't glamorize him as you seem to do.Oh, no, he did something offensive, that's never happened before.
He didn't know Virginia would lose. And I'm not forgetting slaves are normal humans, and I still stand by my point about is choose my home over slaves. The slaves are foreigners, the people from your home aren't. I'm not trying to glamorous him, but you seem to be judging him in the Civil War alone.Virginia lost anyways; he technically chose to jump of the bridge. Moreover, I think you forget that slaves were normal humans, not just tools of enterprise. Hate from them rivaled that of his home any day.
Exactly why I think he wasn't necessarily just a "good" man. His complex attributes paired with an inconsistent record of deeds deemed both questionable and moral, trivial or not, all place him among the ranks of other historical of a similar caliber such as Andrew Carnegie. I won't glamorize him as you seem to do.
I'm not merely stating whether he was absolutely bad or good; thus would be a simpleton answer within a thread of this subjective magnitude. I just want to assert that no man is perfect, and General Lee was no exception. Categorizing him with one word wouldn't be enough in his case.
That defines blind loyalty to its deepest core: staying faithful to something or someone in spite of being offensive to the opposing something or someone else. Within this case, he stayed with Virginia, eventually building up the ire towards himself from slaves across the South. A man should be led by his own ideals. It follows the saying, if he jumped off a bridge, would you choose the same fate?
I can't really remember anything about Robert E. Lee, despite the fact that I took AP U.S. History this year. I forgot basically everything from that class after the school year ended. I don't regard him very highly since he was a Confederate general and all, but I don't know enough about him to judge him too harshly.
That's sad they avoid him on schools because he was confederate. He was a great man. Much kinder then the Yankees.
AKA, "Lets not offend anyone over something they shouldn't be offended over anyways" stuffThey certainly didn't avoid him, I know for sure we discussed him in class as part of the Civil War. There's just so much content in American history that we couldn't spend a lot of time on any single topic. Also, as I said, I already forgot a lot of information from the year. Although maybe in the future they'll avoid covering Lee because literally just a few days ago the curriculum of this class was changed to be more "pro-American" lol >.>
They certainly didn't avoid him, I know for sure we discussed him in class as part of the Civil War. There's just so much content in American history that we couldn't spend a lot of time on any single topic. Also, as I said, I already forgot a lot of information from the year. Although maybe in the future they'll avoid covering Lee because literally just a few days ago the curriculum of this class was changed to be more "pro-American" lol >.>
It's not even offensive. If anyone was offensive, it was the Union! They were very rude.AKA, "Lets not offend anyone over something they shouldn't be offended over anyways" stuff
Exactly lol, that was my point.It's not even offensive. If anyone was offensive, it was the Union! They were very rude.
Yeah, I knew ;3Exactly lol, that was my point.
And the same people who say it is evil are the ones who are cool with the US flag getting stomped on because "It's just a symbol"Yeah, I knew ;3
But, aren't you sick of it? Saying the Confederate flag is evil, shunning some history because it had "Balck Slavery", it's just horrible! I'm ticked off.
And the same people who say it is evil are the ones who are cool with the US flag getting stomped on because "It's just a symbol"