B
BlazingPhoenix
I made Resetti's Bad list.
Banned User
Hah, vitapedia, population: Call of DutyI don't think anyone on this forum cares about the graphics. Otherwise, this would be Vitapedia.
Well, I like this game because it doesn't spend twenty minutes to tell you why you're doing this 3 minutes mission (hello Fantasy Life), on the contrary it spends 3 minutes to give you an excuse to play for twenty minutes.
Another thing that I like is that it's not a game with stupid rules. Like "choose your class and then you can't change". In MH, you can use a Bow for a quest then play with a sword for another quest, no problem. And you don't have limitations on the equipment you use (like "lvl 20 only", this is so annoying), the only restriction is that you must have the materials to craft that equipment.
Last but not least, the multiplayer is really good. Especially since it's completely co-op based. You're 4 (or less) against a monster and you all do your best, checking on other people's health to heal them sometimes, having a support player help the other ones and stuff... Unlike other games where you are fighting other people, which is annoying for "noobs" who get wrecked, or for "pros" who get left out because they wreck everybody.
But really people shouldn't care so much about graphics because games that only center themselves around expensive visuals are missing out on the true point of a game, the adventure. If a good game has great graphics, than perfect, where do i buy, but really graphics should not be the deciding factor on weither or not someone wants to buy a game, or why said person thinks that game is the best. It's sad really, cause I view graphics as the least important part of a game (not counting god awful camera angles) and I know people who only care for them, so I agree with you no one here would love the game simply for visuals.