MindzEye
Pssst. I was gone for almost a year. XD
Towns Folk
I don't particularly care.
Sony and Microsoft do it, no one complains, why is it bad if Nintendo do it? Furthermore, the fees are most likely going to be used for better online services, that doesn't come cheap.
It's kind of annoyed to see them get this double standard, really. Just like with the Switch lineup being "full of ports", when companies like Activision, EA and Ubisoft make yearly rehashes of their games with minimal alterations at full price, lmao.
Just thought I'd tell you this; Nintendo is, (well, was,) signaturely known not to charge internet play. Much of the communal reaction is because they are being asked to pay where other consoles in the past didn't before. I've had some time to get over it, and overtime decide to definitely pay up given how small and infrequently I have to pay for it, but I'm not confused why some people are overtly excited over it.
And if I had to speculate about the switch-lineup complaint, I'd say nobody's seeing anything from Nintendo besides Mario Oddessy, BotW, that ARMS game, maybe 1.2.Switch, and so-on. I can wait until there's more Ninty goodness, of course there will be, but again I'm not confused why the reaction is that.