Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It does, and the review looks like the user remove, 9.6 sounds like a must-buy, I wonder how they got an early copy of the game, maybe Nintendo gave them rights to do so, but why the deletion of the video . If I had a Wii U, Super Mario 3D World would be must-buy for me,oh and IGN gave Super Mario 3D Land a 9.5 overall value, so not sure if that compares the both to an extent.
Yeah I realize that, well its a good strategy.Nintendo gaves early copies (lot of them for reviewers) because if the game is good, they will win a lot of preorders
Yeah, and it's a strategy that is done for a lot of games in general. Nintendo isn't the only one to do it (in fact, Naughty Dog got rid of this feature from Uncharted 2 once they realized it was a bad idea from just the reviewers using itYeah I realize that, well its a good strategy.
Oh well I had no idea, and I realize that other gaming industries gives out review copies, I saw a lot of PS3 video unboxing and reviews, and the Legend of Zelda: A Link Between World review from IGN.Yeah, and it's a strategy that is done for a lot of games in general. Nintendo isn't the only one to do it (in fact, Naughty Dog got rid of this feature from Uncharted 2 once they realized it was a bad idea from just the reviewers using it
I see...but yeah, it's a symbiotic relationship between reviewer and developer tbh By giving a pre-release product to reviewers it, a) promotes media attention for it and b) demonstrates the legitimacy of the reviewers, thus allowing the cycle to continue a lot.Oh well I had no idea, and I realize that other gaming industries gives out review copies, I saw a lot of PS3 video unboxing and reviews, and the Legend of Zelda: A Link Between World review from IGN.
Yeah, I know, its a great strategy as I stated in a few posts ago, I understand what goes on, before someone buys a product the most understandable thing they do is search a review and see what the person has to say.I see...but yeah, it's a symbiotic relationship between reviewer and developer tbh By giving a pre-release product to reviewers it, a) promotes media attention for it and b) demonstrates the legitimacy of the reviewers, thus allowing the cycle to continue a lot.
Yeah pretty much. So in terms of the thread topic, so basically the review got leaked for some time? That's probably going to have a positive effect on sales given it was 9.6 lolYeah, I know, its a great strategy as I stated in a few posts ago, I understand what goes on, before someone buys a product the most understandable thing they do is search a review and see what the person has to say.
Wow, why do they do that ? Some review sites you just can't trust.Now watch as GameSpot gives it an 8.0 and feels that it's superior by doing so.
Wow, why do they do that ? Some review sites you just can't trust.
I think he meant that Gamestop WILL give them a review of 8.0 @Spinnerweb ?I can't find that review T_T
Wow, well that's a good review then, you maybe saw it as soon as it was uploaded, I don't quite understand what they meant by hectic if its playing up to 4 players, I saw the gameplay of the four player and it doesn't look that bad to me.I actually saw the review before it was taken down . It was actually good for ONCE. They were saying it had a good touch to it, the art was good and multiplayer was awesome. The only downside to it was that when you play with 4 players, it's starts getting hectic and the screen goes everywhere. Overall it was good.
well maybe in certain cases the camera can be a bit hectic with 4 players at once. Perhaps that's what they meant with that. idkWow, well that's a good review then, you maybe saw it as soon as it was uploaded, I don't quite understand what they meant by hectic if its playing up to 4 players, I saw the gameplay of the four player and it doesn't look that bad to me.
But all games may seem a little hectic when they are multiple players in-game, I mean Super Smash Bros. Brawl at 4 players made me confuse sometimes, I doubt that they could have given the game a bad rating because of that.well maybe in certain cases the camera can be a bit hectic with 4 players at once. Perhaps that's what they meant with that. idk
idk I never thought it was really hectic with the Brawl camera. Again, probably personal preference lolBut all games may seem a little hectic when they are multiple players in-game, I mean Super Smash Bros. Brawl at 4 players made me confuse sometimes, I doubt that they could have given the game a bad rating because of that.