Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha !Not sure if I should be happy that there's less guys to take chicks now or sad because chicks can take other chicks now :|
I can dream, can't I?Haha !
Well I think you shouldn't mind actually, because even if said chicks (with your words ) didn't have the right to marry, they would not go out with you because they don't like boys anyway
I guess your second sentence answers your firstI can dream, can't I?
And besides, maybe they'd change their mind later on
That's why I pulled a little joke instead of making a serious post xDTbh if I said what's on my mind about this issue I'd offend all gay people and at the same time everyone here might hate me for this. I'm afraid it's a thing that'll eventually lead its way to KSA(that ryhmed )
Depends. If you come with interesting arguments, I'd be glad to hear (or read) them.Tbh if I said what's on my mind about this issue I'd offend all gay people and at the same time everyone here might hate me for this. I'm afraid it's a thing that'll eventually lead its way to KSA(that ryhmed )
(Encouraging yes) Well in that case, people who aren't bisexual please forgive my rudeness. I'm open-minded to a cluster of things but there is nothing I despise more than gay people(lesbian people I don't mind cause I think it's normal that girls tend to create such things as that, not offending lesbians here).Depends. If you come with interesting arguments, I'd be glad to hear (or read) them.
I remember two years ago talking with the only one in my class who was against same-sex marriage. He indeed made everyone his enemy, except me because I was curious to know why he was against it so I asked him without having judging eyes or anything, and he told me, instead of being shouted at by everyone. And I asked him questions about points that were unclear, etc.
And we got to a conclusion at the end : he just doesn't have the same definition of "marriage" as others did. For him, it's really something between a man and a woman, not an abstract contract between two people to get social advantages. And one of the questions I asked him was "so you don't mind if we create another contract that does exactly the same as marriage except that it's not called marriage and it is allowed for same-sex people ?", and he said "I don't mind". Which is kind of ridiculous, the two contracts would be merged eventually in some years time.
But still, he had nothing against gay people, he just had a different definition of marriage and I was glad to be curious enough to see that he was not as close-minded as the so-called open-minded people who labeled him as close-minded without listening to his arguments (notsaying all people against same-sex marriage are as open-minded as he was, but at least he was).
Long post is long lol, I just wanted to say that if you don't just say "I don't like that" the way Apple fanboys say "Apple is better" but come with arguments, you may make an enemy of everyone else here but not me (encouraging, no ? ).
Incest happens in nature, too, but that doesn't make it right.You are aware that even animals have homosexuality right? It's not... not natural. It's really natural and have been around the world since... since always!
Incest happens in nature, too, but that doesn't make it right.
I wasn't trying to compare incest and homosexuality, I was just trying to point out the "it happens in nature" argument doesn't automatically mean we should do it.You really shouldn't compare gay marriage to incest really. My point was about it being natural or not. Not being right or not.
Incest is a totally different matter, as it ends in children with disease. It's quite not the case in the present situation. No actual consequences like that.